Our town is going to the dogs, and you know who is
responsible?
Not the developers. They’re leveling historic slums to build
luxury slums of the future.
Not the folks in charge of our neglected local infrastructure. They’ve
been letting the mold grow in our schools because … well, something has to hold
the crumbling bricks together.
It’s the dog owners. You rotten, self-righteous lovers of
furry beasts that retrieve old tennis balls, you.
I regularly tool around the internet in search of local tidbits I can't find in my hometown newspaper,
such as sports scores of high schools actually located within city limits, and
those jaunts have shown me that our residents love, love, LOVE dogs. They just
have utter contempt for others who disagree with how they chose to raise Rover.
My local social media feeds are often packed tighter than a
peanut butter-filled Kong with pleas for help finding missing dogs.
The responses are usually heartwarming: people volunteering for searches, hopeful
reports of a spotting of Spot, concerned requests for updates, and – more often
than not -- a final happy photo of a smiling owner reunited with the missing canine.
Then comes … the judgment.
In one recent case, a relieved puppy owner thanked everyone
for the help in locating Fido. Then he mentioned his next step would be outfitting his yard with
an “invisible” underground electric fence to contain his pet.
One person admonished him because the “shock” the dog receives when it
gets too near to the fence is painful and cruel -- get a real fence, you
horrible human!
Another warned that coyotes can jump many physical fences and
hawks can swoop in to snatch up smaller pooches – so make sure to put a roof on
it, you sorry so-so!
Then came the cries against anyone who leaves his best bud
alone, unsupervised and outdoors, for even a moment – get a baby carrier and
strap that pup to your chest at all times, you neglectful beast!
Then it got weird.
A new discussion started later about people bringing their
dogs with them into public buildings like supermarkets, hardware stores and
Victoria’s Secret. I guess if you are, as national surveys show, an
average American dog owner who shells out some $1,200 to $1,700 annually
on your pet, you are going want little Fluffy to try on that bustier before you
buy it for her.
But nothing gets owners’ hackles up more than discussing leashes,
or more to the point -- dogs without them in parks and on wooded trails. Our town, of course, has leash laws but, as with many on
the books, they are rarely enforced because when is a police officer roaming the
woods let alone your neighborhood? So, the conversation usually goes like this:
“Dogs need to run and explore and exercise!”
“Obey the flippin’ rules, scofflaw!”
“But my dog is well-behaved and friendly!”
“Well, my child is deathly allergic to dogs!”
“Bring a spray bottle filled with diluted vinegar to fend
off a loose canine!”
“My child is deathly allergic to dogs AND vinegar!”
“Go to the public dog park if you want your dog
off-leash.”
“It’s on the opposite end of town, and it’s lame! Dogs needs
trees to water and water to splash in!”
“Relax! When on those hiking trails, use a long retractable long
leash! It gives doggie room to roam and you still control him!”
“YOU’LL LOSE A FINGER USING THOSE RETRACTABLE LEASHES!!”
“THEY ARE MY FINGERS, PAL! I’LL LOSE AS MANY AS I DAMN-WELL
PLEASE!!!”
As a dog owner myself, I try to reserve judgment of my
fellow Friends of the Flea Bait for worst-case scenarios only. Illegal
breeders. Those who practice or allow true physical harm or neglect. And, most
regularly, you morons who give the rest of us a bad name by not picking up
after your pooch goes potty. Now that’s an online conversation I’ll always step
into.
Photo by Nick Mundackal on Unsplash
No comments:
Post a Comment
REMEMBER: You're at your sexiest when you comment.